🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 361+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(361 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$87
$145
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

In elegant condition, gratis shipping

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011

In charming condition, complimentary shipping

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 574969

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Ceramics

Original Price:$145 USD

Sale Price:$87 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

🚚 shipping & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3183 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
In daily use, the Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011 works fine so no complaints.​
16 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
astonishing quality
shipment was normal. The Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011 arrived safe.
16 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
Five stars for this Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011.
31 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceeded expectations
The Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011 is usable.
37 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young
8 months ago Β· Fresno, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
only what I wanted
From my experience, the Star Trek Spock Ceramic Cookie Jar 2011 is practical and I don’t regret it.
9 people found this helpful